Athletes Overpaid 2 free essay sample

Melvin Garcia 07/19/2011 Written Analysis #3, Chapter 4 I. Introduction Thesis Statement: Professional athletes who perform solely for society’s entertainment are undeservingly overpaid for their talents. These highly skilled athletes contribute relatively little to making society better like many other Samaritan careers which are overlooked and poorly paid. These people are true role models, not athletes. Fans contribute highly to the athletes’ salaries. A. Major proposition or premise (before because): Professional athletes who perform solely for society’s entertainment are undeservingly overpaid for their talents B. st Minor proposition or premise (after because): C. These highly skilled athletes contribute relatively little to making society better like many other Samaritan careers which are overlooked and poorly paid. D. 2nd Minor proposition or premise These people are true role models, not athletes. E. 3rd Minor proposition or premise Fans contribute highl y to the athletes’ salaries. II. A. 1st Minor proposition/premise Professional athletes are undeservingly overpaid B. We will write a custom essay sample on Athletes Overpaid 2 or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Evidence: Expert Testimony: Ted Sherman Philosophical Theory: Karl Marx Historical Examples: Babe Ruth Statistics: Barry Zito Logic: Professional athletes are extremely overpaid. They are recognized for their performance in their careers. The better the athlete performs, the higher his salary whereas many other Samaritan careers are left unnoticed and unappreciated. C. Opposition of 1st minor proposition/premise Professional athletes excel at what they do and should be rewarded handsomely. It is purely for society’s self interest. D. Evidence: Expert Testimony: David Brown Philosophical Theory: Thomas Hobbes Historical Examples: Magic Johnson Statistics: Manny Pacquiao Logic: Professional athletes have a unique talent that no other individual have. That is what makes them extraordinary and they should be paid largely. Society is amazed by special talents performed on the field. F. Refutation of Opposition Premise: Playing sports is just a talent. No one benefits from athlete performing great on the field. This is simply entertainment to society. III. A. 2nd minor proposition/premise Many other careers that are underpaid are considered Samaritans and these people are true role models, not athletes. A. Evidence Expert Testimony: Ryan Gray Philosophical Theory: Fsk’s Guide to Reality Historical Examples: Gandhi Statistics: Charles Barkley Logic: People who serve in their jobs by helping others do not get paid as much as professional athletes. They are not recognized for the hard work they do such as saving lives or providing education. B. Opposition of 2nd minor proposition/premise People may choose whomever they please to be their role model(s) even athletes. D. Evidence Expert Testimony: Timothy Bernstein Philosophical Theory: Freedom of Choice/Speech Historical Examples: Lance Armstrong Statistics: Tiger Woods Logic: According to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has their own opinions and point of views. Thus, who they choose as their role model should not matter to others. E. Refutation of Opposition Premise According to the American Heritage New Dictionary, role models are defined as person(s) who â€Å"serve as an example of the values, attitudes, and behaviors associated with a role† such as a doctor, teacher or firefighter etc. Athletes do not benefit others as much as these samaritan-like jobs thus should not be considered role models. IV. A. 3rd minor proposition/premise Many other careers are overlooked and poorly paid due to the fans’ contributions to athletes’ salries. B. Evidence: Expert Testimony: Jeffrey Guerrero Philosophical Theory: Sara Murray (Supply/Demand) Historical Examples: Mother Teresa Statistics: Tenzin Gyatso Logic: People who serve and actually benefit others as careers get paid merely pennies compared to athletes. C. Opposition of 3rd minor proposition/premise It is the fans who contribute to these athletes’ salaries by paying hundreds for tickets and/or fan merchandise. D. Evidence Expert Testimony: Emma Riley Sutton Philosophical Theory: Stockholm Syndrome Historical Examples: Michael Jordan Statistics: Pope John Logic: Fans willingly pay large amount of money to watch and support these athletes. It is plainly for self-pleasure of the fans. E. Refutation of Opposition Premise Professional athletes do not help humankind nor do they save lives. Their actions in their careers are not as heroic. V. Conclusion Professional athletes should be paid at a negotiable rate even with fans’ contributions. However, when their salaries reach millions of dollars or even billions, it is quite bizarre for a human to be paid that much for performing a unique talent. Other Samaritan careers should be paid higher for helping humankind and/or saving actual lives, and these people are the true role models of society.